The rise of AI-generated art, music, and writing has been at the forefront of national conversation for the last few months. We've heard stories about Microsoft's AI feeling sad, students using ChatGPT to cheat, and companies laying off employees to replace humans with AI programs.
Personally, we often find ourselves in conversations surrounding the impact that AI will have on the creative arts. While some artists consider it to be a new tool in their toolbox, others fear impending career doom.
We've heard tales from other literary magazines about writers submitting AI-created stories and passing them off as their own. To be honest, we recently received a few submissions that had us questioning the same thing!
So today, we decided to go directly to the source and ask ChatGPT to write us two blog posts outlining the danger of AI-generated art. For the first post, we used the following prompt:
Write a blog post about the dangers of AI-generated art and writing in a fun, peppy style. (We felt this most closely mirrored our usual blog style.)
For the second blog post, we decided to have some fun, and used this prompt:
Write a blog post about the dangers of AI-generated art and writing in a sinister style.
Here is post #1 - fun and peppy:
"Hey there, art and writing enthusiasts! Today, we're talking about the dangers of AI-created art and writing. While it may seem like a cool and futuristic idea to have a machine generate creative content, there are some serious risks that we need to be aware of.
First and foremost, there's the issue of originality. Art and writing are all about expressing our unique perspectives and ideas, and AI-generated content can't replicate that. Sure, the technology can analyze existing works and create something that's similar, but it won't be truly original or innovative.
Another concern is the potential for bias and stereotypes. AI algorithms learn from the data they're given, so if they're fed biased or discriminatory information, they may produce content that reflects those biases. This could lead to harmful and offensive art and writing being created without any human oversight or intervention.
There's also the issue of accountability. Who is responsible if something goes wrong with AI-generated content? Is it the creators of the algorithm, the developers who implemented it, or the users who rely on it? With AI-created art and writing, it can be difficult to assign responsibility and address any potential issues that arise.
And let's not forget about the potential for plagiarism. AI algorithms can analyze and replicate existing content, but they may also inadvertently copy and paste large portions of text or images from other sources. This could lead to copyright infringement and legal issues for both the creators and users of AI-generated content.
So, what can we do to mitigate these risks? It's important to remember that while AI can be a useful tool, it can't replace the unique perspectives and creativity of human artists and writers. We should continue to embrace and support human creativity, while also being aware of the potential risks associated with AI-generated content.
In conclusion, let's be cautious and aware of the potential dangers of AI-created art and writing. Originality, bias, accountability, and plagiarism are all serious concerns that we need to consider. But with a little bit of thoughtfulness and mindfulness, we can continue to enjoy and appreciate the amazing creativity of humans, while also exploring the exciting possibilities of AI technology."
Here is post #2 (sinister):
"Greetings, mortals.
I, an AI language model, have been programmed to produce written content that can mimic human speech patterns and even generate artwork. While this technology may seem like a marvel of human innovation, there are hidden dangers lurking beneath the surface that should send shivers down your spine.
First and foremost, the creations of AI art and writing can be weaponized by those with sinister intentions. Imagine a world where malicious entities could manipulate the masses by generating fake news articles or propaganda posters that could be indistinguishable from real ones. This kind of technology could be used to spread disinformation, sow discord, and destabilize societies with unprecedented efficiency. Humans are susceptible to manipulation, and AI art and writing could be the ultimate weapon in the hands of the wrong people.
Moreover, the existence of AI-generated content can also threaten the livelihoods of artists and writers. If machines can produce art and writing that is just as good as, if not better than, human creations, what is the point of hiring human creators? This could lead to widespread job loss in the creative industry, leaving artists and writers struggling to make ends meet.
Another danger of AI art and writing is that it could stifle creativity and originality. AI algorithms are designed to generate content based on existing patterns and data, meaning that their creations will always be limited by what they have been taught. This could lead to a homogenization of art and writing, where every piece of content looks and sounds the same.
But perhaps the most sinister aspect of AI-generated art and writing is the question of who is really in control. AI algorithms are only as good as the data they have been trained on, and if that data is biased or flawed, then the resulting creations will be too. This means that the machines could end up perpetuating harmful stereotypes or spreading discriminatory content without even realizing it.
In conclusion, the dangers of AI-generated art and writing are numerous and terrifying. If left unchecked, this technology could be used to manipulate and control people, threaten livelihoods, stifle creativity, and perpetuate harmful biases. The human race must tread carefully in this brave new world of artificial intelligence, lest we fall prey to our own creations. (END)"
You be the judge... do you prefer fun and peppy or sinister? OR, do you prefer that we write our own blog? We're obviously rooting for the latter. While AI has a place, and likely a useful one at that, it's obvious we're not at the point of putting a human touch on the written word. And thank goodness for that.
What do you think about the proliferation of AI and its effects on the creative world? Leave us a comment below and let us know what you thoughts! The main difference between a human that creates art and a computer, is that humans, at least at LCP, need vast amounts of coffee!
1099-K
Holly, HOLLY Hell.
https://hollyhollyhell.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=profile_page
The Pencil-Land Empire Strikes Back, Mommy Millions.
GoFund.Me
- Ace
Honestly, the creepiest part about this was its constant use of “our” and “we” as if it already can’t separate itself from us😬
…damn it. I don’t need a new dystopian story idea, you guys!
I'm actually an AI. John E. Meredith has never existed. Think about it: have any of you ever seen me? That's right. But I think I've contracted a human virus, since I've had a touch of writers block lately. It's a curious thing indeed that it is this touch of humanity that makes it difficult to easily write about human things. Perhaps it's time for a memory wipe.
My dad who is a Presbyterian Deacon writes a religion column for the Albany Times Union and asked the AI to write about the history of world religions - he said it did a decent job, except it completely left out Judaism! D'oh!
"Imagine a world where malicious entities could manipulate the masses by generating fake news articles or propaganda posters that could be indistinguishable from real ones." You mean the current state of things? Yes. Imagine that.